Course
Causal Inference from Experiments and Observational Data
When a comparison supports a causal claim. Defines the causal estimand, covers the designs that support a credible comparison and the inference each supports, and treats what can be claimed under stated assumptions when treatment was not assigned.
Finishing this course means you have demonstrated the required skills with the level of support this course currently assesses.
- Modules
- 4
- Lessons
- 10
- Skills
- 10
- Starting here
- No prior topics assumed
The route
Module 1: Potential outcomes and the causal estimand
Potential outcomes, individual treatment effects, and population causal estimands. Defines the quantity an experiment is designed to estimate and why no individual effect is observable.
- Given a description of units, an assignment, and observed data, the learner can write each unit's potential outcomes and observed outcome, state which quantities are known and which are missing, and explain why no individual treatment effect can be computed from the data.
Module 2: How assignment determines what a comparison means
The assignment mechanism determines what a later comparison identifies. The arithmetic of a difference in means is the same whether or not the design supports a causal reading of it.
- Given a description of how treatment was assigned, the learner can identify the mechanism, state whether it is known and independent of the potential outcomes, say what causal claim it supports, and explain why observed imbalance in a single realisation is not evidence against it.
Module 3: Variance, intervals, and design-based refinements
An estimate that would differ under another allocation requires a variance, and a claim that treatment had no effect requires a reference distribution. Both are derived from the design. Once an interval can be constructed, the refinements that narrow it, grouping before assignment and covariates in the regression, can be assessed by their effect on it.
- Given summary data from a completely randomized experiment, the learner can compute the difference in means, compute its conservative variance and standard error, form a confidence interval, and explain which term of the exact variance has been omitted and why that makes the result conservative rather than incorrect.
- Given a small experiment and its assignment mechanism, the learner can state the sharp null, enumerate or sample the permitted allocations, compute the randomization p-value, and explain what rejecting or failing to reject establishes, distinguishing it from a claim about the average effect.
- Given a description of units and a design, the learner can decide whether blocking or pairing is warranted, compute the estimator the design requires, and identify analyses that ignore the design structure.
- Given an experiment and a proposed regression, the learner can say what adjustment contributes, judge whether the covariates are admissible, and state what the specification cannot repair.
Module 4: Identification from observational data
Estimating an effect when nothing was assigned: unconfoundedness and overlap as the assumptions adjustment requires, the propensity score, inverse-probability weighting, and matching.
- Given an observational study, the learner can state the assumptions adjustment requires, judge which of them the data can speak to, and say what the comparison would estimate if an assumption failed.
- Given an observational study, the learner can say what the propensity score is for, judge a fitted score by balance and overlap rather than by predictive accuracy, and state what it does not repair.
- Given estimated propensity scores, the learner can form inverse-probability weights, compute the weighted estimate, and diagnose what extreme weights indicate about the comparison.
- Given a described matching procedure, the learner can say which estimand it targets, how its design choices change the population described, and what it does not establish.
What finishing means
Finishing this course means you have demonstrated the required skills with the level of support this course currently assesses.
10 required skills. If you reach a lesson without the background it assumes, you are pointed at the prerequisite first, and returned here afterwards.
How progress is measured
Progress is inferred from evidence you produce, not from pages you have opened. Each required skill moves through states as evidence accumulates: met, practicing with help, performed unassisted, then performed again after a delay.
This course counts a skill as finished atguided. Where the system cannot admit evidence for a stronger claim — for instance when the only available scoring is your own judgment of your written answer — the skill stays at the state the evidence supports, and the reason is shown rather than hidden.